Why Is Quantum Mechanics So Difficult To Understand?

Illustration of Erwin Schroedinger's (or Schroedinger) thought experiment, where the cat is both alive and dead due to interpretations of quantum mechanics and state known as a quantum superposition.

If you read sci-fi comics, you must’ve noticed that buzzwords get thrown around quite often. Words like “quantum mechanics”, “singularity”, “quantum decoherence” and whatnot. They catch the readers’ attention unlike anything and introduce a sense of mystery regarding the phenomena, making the reader wonder about the quantum world. This contributes to the narrative that QM is hard. 

Well, let’s demystify the quantum world, for the true beauty of science lies not in the wonder of mysterious phenomena but the repeated attempts at understanding them and pushing the boundaries of knowledge. 

Quantization of Energy: Breaking Established Laws

The word ‘quantum’ in physics is not an adjective that would describe a certain entity. Instead, quantum actually comes from the word ‘quantized’. In the 1900s, it was discovered that the energy of micro-scale systems (a collection of molecules, atoms, electrons bound to a metal, etc.) can only have certain allowed values.

Imagine throwing a tennis ball. The speed of the ball could in principle have any speed in the continuous range from 0 km/h to 150 km/h (realistically, based on arm strength). But, if the ball was subjected to quantum mechanical laws, then the ball would move only at certain allowed values, for example, at speeds which are multiples of 2km/h (i.e. 2, 4, 6, 8, …) or at speeds which are exponents of 3km/h (i.e. 3, 9, 27, 81,…). This would mean that there exist some forbidden speeds at which the ball cannot move. Thus, the plot of speed versus time would be a discontinuous plot. This rather absurd phenomenon is actually true for quantum particles like electrons and protons. This is called quantization of velocity. Since kinetic energy depends on velocity, quantization of velocity also leads to quantization of energy.

Ultraviolet Catastrophe: First Hint of the Quantum World

In the late 19th century, physicists tried to calculate the total energy emitted by an ideal blackbody. This involved summing the energies of all the atoms constituting the blackbody using the laws of classical physics. What followed shook the foundations of physics to its core. It was calculated that the energy emitted by a blackbody in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings is infinite. In layman’s terms, this implied that the energy emitted by the blackbody is greater than the energy of all the stars, planets, comets, asteroids, etc. in the universe combined.  

Black bodygraph

The ‘catastrophe’ was the incorrect prediction made by classical theory at low wavelengths/high frequencies. It indicated that something was fundamentally flawed with classical physics. (Photo Credit : Larenmclan/Wikimedia commons)

This absurd result prompted physicists to look for alternative theories. The problem was solved when Max Planck assumed that the atoms making up the blackbody emitted energy with only certain allowed values. In simple terms, it meant that energy emitted by all the atoms was quantized. Simplifying further, each atom could emit certain allowed energies. This simple assumption solved the problem of infinite energy and theoretical calculations (which earlier gave absurd results) matched with practical observation. 

Weird Phenomena at the Quantum Scale

What if you were told that you have a wave associated with you? So does your car, your house, your clothes. In-fact all physical matter in the universe has a wave nature associated with it. 

Single Electron Interference

Interference is the superposition (vector addition) of waves of same frequency travelling in the same direction.

In this experiment, a source emits electrons towards a photographic film kept some distance apart. Between the source (S) and the film (F) lies a wall (W) with two holes in it some distance apart. The electron emission rate is controlled such that only a single electron crosses at a time. Classical analogy would be a tennis ball thrower shooting towards a wall with two holes such that at a time, only a single ball crosses the wall. A sheet behind the wall records the area where the ball hits.


The double slit apparatus. (Photo Credit : NekoJaNekoJa/ Wikimedia Commons)

Classical theory (tennis ball) would predict that the striking pattern obtained on the sheet would be random. Extending this theory to the quantum world (single electron), a random strike pattern on the photographic film (F) would be expected. 

But the observations surprised physicists. The pattern obtained on F consisted of areas of high intensity and low intensity placed a regular distance apart. This pattern is similar to interference pattern caused by light waves. The fact that a pattern characteristic of waves was caused by particles (electrons), it was concluded that particles also have wave-like character.


The interference pattern due to a single electron. (Photo Credit : Dr. Tonomura/Wikimedia commons)

Quantum Decoherence: Destroying Observability

Continuing further with the single electron interference experiment, originally, the apparatus was kept out of observation while it ran. It means that while the electrons were being emitted and were hitting the film F, no observation of the process was made. After the experiment ran for a few hours, it was stopped and the film was retrieved. But what if the experiment was recorded by a camera? Or observed with the naked eye?

Well, quite surprisingly, the interference pattern vanished, or rather, no pattern like the earlier one was observed. In this case, the pattern was random, just like the tennis ball experiment. In other words, observation destroys interference. This isn’t the case with tennis balls though. You may keep as many cameras and spectators as you want, yet the pattern wouldn’t change.   

This happens because, at the quantum scale when light photons strike the electron, the electron gets disturbed from its original path. Thus, in an attempt to make a measurement, observation is lost. 

Quantum Tunnelling

Imagine that a tennis ball was restricted to move in a room with infinitely high walls. There’s no way that the ball would cross through the walls even at high speeds (no breaking of wall allowed). Because crossing the wall requires the ball to be higher than the wall height, it is actually impossible for the ball to move out. Similarly, on the quantum scale, if an electron is restricted to an infinitely deep potential well (akin to walls), one might expect the electron to remain trapped forever with zero chances (read probability) of crossing the wall. But, QM is here to surprise again. There does exist a finite probability that the electron will cross the potential wall when it strikes. This is observed even in real life. Two metallic conductors are soldered together to immobilize the joint. Yet, the solder is a potential barrier. Electrons have a finite probability of crossing the wall and thus the circuit remains closed and electricity flows.   

Quantum Tunnelling animation

Tunnelling effect can be explained by assuming that a wave nature is associated with the electron and some clever mathematics. (Photo Credit : Yuvalr/Wikimedia commons)

Conditioned Thinking With Classical Physics

Since introductory and intermediate level physics involves classical physics, it becomes easier to relate to daily phenomena using these theories. But, when quantum mechanics is first introduced, it invariably starts with postulates about wavefunction which is difficult to relate to. Moreover, since quantum particles don’t obey classical laws, predicting their behaviour becomes difficult and so does understanding the mathematical framework of QM. It’s not easy to think about operators, wavefunctions, etc. without trying to find a classical analogy, which doesn’t exist.

Schrodinger Equation.svg

If you’re not accustomed to differential equations, complex numbers and UG level algebra, then QM will seem unnecessarily hard because mathematics is the language of physics. (Photo Credit : Inkscape /Wikimedia commons)

The post Why Is Quantum Mechanics So Difficult To Understand? appeared first on Science ABC.